[参考译文] AM62A7-Q1：wave5：H.265 编码器：对 RTP 流进行编码时未引用的内核分页请求

Brandon 的最新补丁修复了我们发现的比赛条件。 我运行修补程序的稍微修改（较早）的版本已有 3 天、没有出现任何问题。

From 66dbdc5b5d2dd37a405bdd9111a780ece399550c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brandon Brnich <b-brnich@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 12:05:18 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] media: chips-media: wave5: Move src_buf Removal to
 finish_encode

During encoder processing, there is a case where the IRQ response could
return the buffer back to userspace via v4l2_m2m_buf_done call. In this
time, userspace could queue up this same buffer before start_encode removes
the index from the ready queue. This would then lead to a case where the
buffer in the ready queue could be a self loop due to the
WRITE_ONCE(prev->next, new) call in __list_add.

When __list_del is finally called, the loop is already made so nothing
points back to ready queue list head and pointers are poisoned.

A buffer should not be marked as DONE before the buffer is removed from
m2m ready queue. Move removal entirely to finish_encode.

Signed-off-by: Brandon Brnich <b-brnich@ti.com>
---

This bug is very hard to reproduce in simple encode environments. It
primarily occurs during long run cases where CPU is strained doing other
forms of computation. Crash log shared below.

I see other drivers removing buffer in their device_run process, but
they do it before any chance of DONE state transition. Wave5 should do
the same.

[ 609.879961] pc : v4l2_m2m_buf_remove_by_idx+0x84/0xe8 [v4l2_mem2mem]
[ 609.886313] lr : v4l2_m2m_buf_remove_by_idx+0x28/0xe8 [v4l2_mem2mem]
[ 609.892663] sp : ffff800081a4bbd0
[ 609.895968] x29: ffff800081a4bbd0 x28: 0000000000000000 x27: 000000000007f800
[ 609.903096] x26: 00000000aefd2800 x25: 0000000000000780 x24: ffff0000014efdc8
[ 609.910224] x23: ffff0000014efc28 x22: ffff0000014efc00 x21: ffff0000014eff60
[ 609.917351] x20: ffff0000014efdc8 x19: ffff000001daf800 x18: 0000000000000000
[ 609.924478] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000 x15: 0000000000000002
[ 609.931605] x14: 0000000000000800 x13: 00000000000001e6 x12: 0000000000000000
[ 609.938732] x11: 0000000000000000 x10: 00000000000009d0 x9 : ffff800081a4bcc0
[ 609.945859] x8 : ffff800081a4bc88 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffff0000014eff50
[ 609.952986] x5 : dead000000000100 x4 : dead000000000100 x3 : dead000000000122
[ 609.960113] x2 : 0000000000000100 x1 : 0000000000000000 x0 : ffff000001dafc00
[ 609.967242] Call trace:
[ 609.969678] v4l2_m2m_buf_remove_by_idx+0x84/0xe8 [v4l2_mem2mem]
[ 609.975685] start_encode+0x28c/0x554 [wave5]
[ 609.980063] wave5_vpu_enc_device_run+0x10c/0x230 [wave5]
[ 609.985466] v4l2_m2m_try_run+0x84/0x140 [v4l2_mem2mem]
[ 609.990692] v4l2_m2m_device_run_work+0x14/0x20 [v4l2_mem2mem]
[ 609.996522] process_one_work+0x148/0x28c
[ 610.000532] worker_thread+0x2d0/0x3d8
[ 610.004277] kthread+0x110/0x114
[ 610.007500] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20

 .../chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c         | 32 +++----------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c
index 7613fcdbafed..3e198a7cefb1 100644
--- a/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c
+++ b/drivers/media/platform/chips-media/wave5/wave5-vpu-enc.c
@@ -223,17 +223,9 @@ static int start_encode(struct vpu_instance *inst, u32 *fail_res)
 		dst_buf->vb2_buf.timestamp = src_buf->vb2_buf.timestamp;
 		v4l2_m2m_buf_done(src_buf, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
 		v4l2_m2m_buf_done(dst_buf, VB2_BUF_STATE_ERROR);
-	} else {
+	} else
 		dev_dbg(inst->dev->dev, "%s: wave5_vpu_enc_start_one_frame success\n",
 			__func__);
-		/*
-		 * Remove the source buffer from the ready-queue now and finish
-		 * it in the videobuf2 framework once the index is returned by the
-		 * firmware in finish_encode
-		 */
-		if (src_buf)
-			v4l2_m2m_src_buf_remove_by_idx(m2m_ctx, src_buf->vb2_buf.index);
-	}
 
 	return 0;
 }
@@ -259,27 +251,13 @@ static void wave5_vpu_enc_finish_encode(struct vpu_instance *inst)
 		__func__,  enc_output_info.pic_type, enc_output_info.recon_frame_index,
 		enc_output_info.enc_src_idx, enc_output_info.enc_pic_byte, enc_output_info.pts);
 
-	/*
-	 * The source buffer will not be found in the ready-queue as it has been
-	 * dropped after sending of the encode firmware command, locate it in
-	 * the videobuf2 queue directly
-	 */
 	if (enc_output_info.enc_src_idx >= 0) {
-		struct vb2_buffer *vb = vb2_get_buffer(v4l2_m2m_get_src_vq(m2m_ctx),
-						       enc_output_info.enc_src_idx);
-		if (vb->state != VB2_BUF_STATE_ACTIVE)
-			dev_warn(inst->dev->dev,
-				 "%s: encoded buffer (%d) was not in ready queue %i.",
-				 __func__, enc_output_info.enc_src_idx, vb->state);
-		else
-			src_buf = to_vb2_v4l2_buffer(vb);
-
-		if (src_buf) {
+		src_buf = v4l2_m2m_src_buf_remove(m2m_ctx);
+		if (!src_buf)
+			dev_warn(inst->dev->dev, "%s: no source buffer found\n", __func__);
+		else {
 			inst->timestamp = src_buf->vb2_buf.timestamp;
 			v4l2_m2m_buf_done(src_buf, VB2_BUF_STATE_DONE);
-		} else {
-			dev_warn(inst->dev->dev, "%s: no source buffer with index: %d found\n",
-				 __func__, enc_output_info.enc_src_idx);
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
2.43.0

使用此修补程序、我的问题已得到解决。 感谢 Brandon 和 Suren Porwar 的支持 ！

此致、

Bas Vermeulen