This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

MOSFET Upgrade Nightmare in Push-Pull LLC: 2× Voltage Spike! Begging TI Masters to Kill Parasitic Capacitance

Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UCC27517, TPS28225, ISO5852S

1. Design Context
Developing 300kHz/150W LLC converter (48Vin). Replaced BJT push-pull with MOSFET for efficiency:

  • Original: Onsemi FJL6920TU (BJT)

  • New: VBsemi VBGQA1602 (60V/3mΩ)

  • Driver: TI UCC27517 (0.5A peak)

2. Disaster Scene (Lab Data)
Efficiency improved 91%→94%, but MOSFETs exploded:

  • Symptoms:
     96V spikes on Vds at full load (200% Vin!)
    → 105MHz ringing on Vgs (Scope shot Fig1)

  • Critical Parameters:

    Parameter Value
    Cgd (VBGQA1602) 180pF
    Loop Inductance 35nH
    Switching Speed 18ns
    Spike Duration 42ns

3. Failed Rescue Attempts
 Enhanced Driving:

  • Added totem-pole with TI TPS28225 → Drive current 2A
    → Outcome: Spikes reduced to 82V, but ringing worsened (Fig2)
     RC Snubber:

  • DS snubber (2.2Ω+470pF) → Spikes 68V, but 1.8W added loss
     MOSFET Swap:

  • Used TI CSD19536 (Cgd=65pF) → Spikes eliminated, but 300% cost overrun

4. Desperate Plea to TI Community
Seeking wisdom from TI experts:
 Drive Design:

  • Is isolated driver (e.g. TI ISO5852S) mandatory? Any cost-sensitive alternatives?

  • Is Rg=√(L_loop/Ciss) valid for such scenarios?
     Parasitic Taming:

  • How to quantify PCB stray inductance vs Cgd resonance? TI AN-2014's F_ring=1/(2π√(L_stray×Cgd)) shows >40% error!
     TI Device Trade-off:

  • Any cost-performance TI MOSFET between CSD19536 ($4.2) and local MOS ($0.9)? Specs:

    text
    Vds≥60V, Rds(on)≤5mΩ, Cgd<100pF, DFN5x6  

5. Bounty for Heroes
Fire For proven solutions:

  • Get my 《Miller Oscillation Survival Guide》(with TI TINA models)

  • All design files released at 100+ upvotes (Schematic+PCB+Waveform analysis)