This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

BQ25960EVM: Question about the schematic diagram

Part Number: BQ25960EVM
Other Parts Discussed in Thread: BQ25960, BQ25980

Hi TI Team!

We used two BQ25960 IC,Among them, U1000 was the primary charger, while U1001 was the secondary charger.

the secondary BQ25960 batp/batn_srp pin connected to the GND in the datasheet but batp/batn_srp pin connected to the battery terminal in the EVM.

1、So, how should this be connected?

2、On primary BQ25960, since there is a certain distance between the current sampling resistor and the negative terminal of the battery, there will be a voltage drop.The SRP/BATN pin simultaneously samples the terminal voltage of the battery negative terminal and the current through the resistance. Whether the detected terminal voltage of the battery negative terminal or the current is inaccurate?

3、Why the secondary BQ25960 TSBAT pull-up power supply  set to REGN_M instead of REGN_S?

  • 感谢您对TI产品的关注!
    关于你的咨询,我们正在确认你的问题,稍后回复您。

  • First, I highly recommend using 2x BQ25960 in parallel by configuring each as a standalone device and controlling them separately, rather than configuring them as primary and secondary devices and using the SYNC pin.

    This approach is the most common way that customers use 2x BQ25960, and we have much better validation coverage for using two devices in standalone mode. Additionally, there’s no performance benefit to the primary/secondary configuration, and almost all protections are disabled on the secondary device in this configuration since they’re handled by the primary device. There’s no need to connect the SYNC pin between the devices when each are in standalone mode. Overall, a dual-standalone configuration is a simpler, more flexible, and better-supported approach.

    We used two BQ25960 IC,Among them, U1000 was the primary charger, while U1001 was the secondary charger.

    the secondary BQ25960 batp/batn_srp pin connected to the GND in the datasheet but batp/batn_srp pin connected to the battery terminal in the EVM.

    So, how should this be connected?

    BATP/BATN_SRP can be tied to GND on the secondary device, as shown in the datasheet. On the EVM, BATP and BATN of the secondary device are connected to the battery terminals for evaluation flexibility.

    2、On primary BQ25960, since there is a certain distance between the current sampling resistor and the negative terminal of the battery, there will be a voltage drop.The SRP/BATN pin simultaneously samples the terminal voltage of the battery negative terminal and the current through the resistance. Whether the detected terminal voltage of the battery negative terminal or the current is inaccurate?

    If the negative terminal of the battery and sense resistor are connected relatively close to each other and by a large copper pour, I wouldn’t expect there to be a significant delta between the negative terminal of the battery and the sense resistor. Please note that VBATOVP, VOUTOVP, IBATOCP, VBATADC, VOUTADC, and IBATADC all have associated accuracy specs. For reference, please see the below image showing the BATN connection on the EVM. Please note that the positive side of the sense resistor and the negative terminal of the battery share a copper pour, and BATN is Kelvin-connected to the positive sense resistor pad.

    3、Why the secondary BQ25960 TSBAT pull-up power supply  set to REGN_M instead of REGN_S?

    TSBAT can be pulled up to either REGN_M or REGN_S for evaluation flexibility.

    Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions.

  • Hi TI Team

    Thank you for your response.I have changed to using 2x BQ25960 in parallel by configuring each as a standalone device.The attached PDF file is a schematic. Please help review it.Besides, I have two questions.

    BQ25980_20250714.pdf

    1、Should the addresses all be set to the standalone mode as listed in the table?

    2、The USB and BAT temperature are read by the platform's main PMIC, therefore BQ25980 TSBUS and TSBAT PIN is possible to be float or some other simple method?

  • Hello,

    I've reviewed the BQ25960 portion of the schematic. I have a few questions:

    • PMID has 2x 10uF on the master and slave. It's highly recommended to have 10uF on PMID. 20uF on PMID is expected to have a negative impact on efficiency. Could this be changed?
    • VBUS has 10uF on the master and slave. It's highly recommended to have 1uF on VBUS. This is also expected to have a negative impact on efficiency. Could this be changed?
    • BATP and BATN of the master and slave are connected. This is okay, but I'm just curious if they will use this on both chargers? Sometimes, customers only use this on one of the chargers.

    Please see my other comments below:

    • VOUT has 2x 10uF on the master and slave. It's recommended to have 22uF on VOUT. This is acceptable.
    • VAC2 of the master and VAC1/2 of the slave are connected to VBUS.
    • /INT, SDA, and SCL are each pulled up and connected to the MCU.
    • 3x 22uF capacitors are used on CF1 and CF2.
    • A 220nF is connected between CDRVH and CDRVL_ADDRMS for the master and slave.
    • BATP is connected to the positive battery terminal through a 100ohm resistor for the master and slave.
    • BATN is connected to the negative battery terminal and positive side of the sense resistor for the master and slave.
    • ACDRV1 of the master is connected to ACFET1 (no RBFET in design).
    • ACDRV2 of the master and ACDRV1/2 of the slave are tied to GND, since the master is controlling the ACFET.
    • REGN has a 4.7uF capacitor on the master and slave.
    • SRN_SYNCIN is connected to the bottom of the 2mohm sense resistor for the master and slave.
    • CDRVL_ADDRMS of the master has a 6.2k resistor, which sets the master's I2C address to 0x67 and mode to standalone.
    • CDRVL_ADDRMS of the slave has a 14k resistor, which sets the slave's I2C address to 0x66 and mode to standalone.

    1、Should the addresses all be set to the standalone mode as listed in the table?

    Yes, the configuration of each device should be set to standalone mode. This appears to be correct in the schematic. The >75k option can be utilized by not placing an address resistor on one of the chargers.


    2、The USB and BAT temperature are read by the platform's main PMIC, therefore BQ25980 TSBUS and TSBAT PIN is possible to be float or some other simple method?

    Yes, TSBUS and TSBAT can float if not being used, as long as these features are disabled in REG0x0A via I2C.

    Please feel free to share any changes to the schematic, and I'd be happy to review them.

  • Hi TI Team!

    The updated schematic has been uploaded. Please review it again.

    BQ25960-20250716.pdf

    1、PMID has been changed to 10uF on the master and slave

    2、VBUS has been changed to 1uF on the master and slave.

    3、VOUT has been changed to 22uF on the master and slave.

    4、In order to simplify the layout design,TSBUS and TSBAT PIN float on the master and slave.

    5、Not placing an address resistor on one of the U1000 chargers.

    But I didn't quite understand this question.

    “BATP and BATN of the master and slave are connected. This is okay, but I'm just curious if they will use this on both chargers? Sometimes, customers only use this on one of the chargers.”    you mean using one charger and two chargers, BATP and BATN is any difference in this connection?

  • Hello,

    Thanks for following up. I've reviewed the updated BQ25960 portion of the schematic. Please see my comments below:

    • CDRVL_ADDRMS has a 6.2k resistor that has been marked as "NC."
    • PMID has a 10uF capacitor on the master and slave.
    • REGN is no longer connected to TSBUS and TSBAT on each the master and slave.
    • TSBAT and TSBUS are floating on each the master and slave, as the platform's PMIC will handle these protections.
    • VBUS has a 1uF capacitor on the master and slave.
    • VOUT has a 22uF capacitor on the master and slave. The other 10uF capacitor has been marked as "NC."

    These changes are good.

    you mean using one charger and two chargers, BATP and BATN is any difference in this connection?

    Customers will sometimes only use BATP and BATN on one of the chargers to simplify their design. There is no problem with routing BATP and BATN for each charger, but if your customer wants to simplify their design, they can connect BATP, BATN and SRN_SYNCIN to GND on the other charger. I do not recommend floating these pins.

  • Hi Links

    If connect BATP, BATN and SRN_SYNCIN to GND on the other charger,Will the functionality of this standalone charger be affected since it is unable to read the voltage and current anymore?

  • Hi Links

    If connect BATP, BATN and SRN_SYNCIN to GND on the other charger,Will the functionality of this standalone charger be affected since it is unable to read the voltage and current anymore?

  • The functionality of the charger will not be affected by tying BATP, BATN, and SRN_SYNCIN to GND. 

    This charger won't ever trip VOUTOVP, VBATOVP, or IBATOCP, but these protections will be provided by the other charger. VOUTUVLO and VOUTPRESENT, which are conditions for I2C communication and enabling the converter, are sensed at VOUT, not at BATP and BATN.