This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
您好,建议您将完整的数据上传试一下,附件是成功的GPCCEDV 数据和报告,您可以参考一下
4048.GPCPackaged-report.zip2465.GPCPackaged.zip
此为完整数据,我是直接恒温箱里设置充满静置放空的时间,静置都是2h,充电也是在恒温箱充的,但是通过采集的数据看不出误差大的原因,麻烦帮忙看下,谢谢!
我做了几款数据发现我们客户给的电芯0度下的误差都比较大,但常温下都还好,这款不知道怎么回事常温下小电流和高温下小电流误差比较大
您好,这个问题已经在E2E英文论坛发布,请关注一下。
https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1011390/gpccedv-gpccedv-report-deviation-is-so-high-that-it-is-most-likely-due-to-anomaly-in-the-data
数据我是上传GPCPackager自动生成的文件名,高温和低温大电流都是采用4A,小电流都是采用2.2A不同温度下电流精度可能会有误差,我看了没超过10mA
您好,您的问题在E2E英文论坛已有工程师跟进,请继续关注
https://e2e.ti.com/support/power-management-group/power-management/f/power-management-forum/1011390/gpccedv-gpccedv-report-deviation-is-so-high-that-it-is-most-likely-due-to-anomaly-in-the-data
0882.GPCPackaged-report.zip3250.GPCPackaged.zip
Hello! I collected the data again according to the requirements, but the error in the generated report is still very large and there is not much improvement. Please help to have a look, thank you!