SimpleBLEPeripheral中的Characteristic 1 2 3 4 5的模式都是定死的吗？？

定不定死我不太确定，我有尝试改动过，不过出来运行都不行。不过我有看到别人改动char1成功的案例。我自己这的问题我是添加了一个char6来满足我自己应用的需要的

还有个地方要改吧：

static uint8 simpleProfile_ReadAttrCB( uint16 connHandle, gattAttribute_t *pAttr,
uint8 *pValue, uint8 *pLen, uint16 offset, uint8 maxLen )
{

......

switch ( uuid )
{
// No need for "GATT_SERVICE_UUID" or "GATT_CLIENT_CHAR_CFG_UUID" cases;
// gattserverapp handles those reads

// characteristics 1 and 2 have read permissions
// characteritisc 3 does not have read permissions; therefore it is not
// included here
// characteristic 4 does not have read permissions, but because it
// can be sent as a notification, it is included here
case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR1_UUID:
case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR2_UUID:
case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR4_UUID:
*pLen = 1;
pValue[0] = *pAttr->pValue;
break;

case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR5_UUID:
*pLen = SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR5_LEN;
VOID osal_memcpy( pValue, switch ( uuid )
{
// No need for "GATT_SERVICE_UUID" or "GATT_CLIENT_CHAR_CFG_UUID" cases;
// gattserverapp handles those reads

// characteristics 1 and 2 have read permissions
// characteritisc 3 does not have read permissions; therefore it is not
// included here
// characteristic 4 does not have read permissions, but because it
// can be sent as a notification, it is included here
case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR1_UUID:
case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR2_UUID:
case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR4_UUID:
*pLen = 1;
pValue[0] = *pAttr->pValue;
break;

case SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR5_UUID:
*pLen = SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR5_LEN;
VOID osal_memcpy( pValue, pAttr->pValue, SIMPLEPROFILE_CHAR5_LEN );
break;

simpleProfile_ReadAttrCB 函数中缺了CHAR3_UUID:项读，需要加上去，而你的上面修改明显没有加这项。

TI有点奇怪，本来特性都是差不多的，读写为什么都要各个分别编程，最起码应有个公共的方法才对，他的缺省是不处理。