• 状态 TI Thinks Resolved
  • 已锁定 已锁定
  • 回复 6 回复
  • 答案 1 答案
  • 订户 17 订户
  • 视图 863 视图
  • 用户 0 会员在此处
选项
选项
相关

This thread has been locked.

If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.

J721EXSOMXEVM: Does TDA4 EP mode support P2P after being configured in EP mode?

zxj
Prodigy 110 points
Part Number: J721EXSOMXEVM

Hello,

I would like to implement PCIe P2P functionality using J721E, with one J721E acting as the RC and the other as the EP.

1.Does J721E（EP mode） support P2P?

2.If the J721E does not support PCIe P2P in EP mode, are there any other product series that can achieve this?

3.I am also unclear about the hardware requirements for enabling PCIe P2P in EP mode. Do you have any related documentation on P2P hardware?

Best regards

  • 0
    TI__Mastermind 24435 points

    已经收到了您的案例，调查需要些时间，感谢您的耐心等待。

  • 0 回复 Eirwen
    Prodigy 110 points

    Looking forward to your reply.

    Best regard
  • 0 回复 zxj
    TI__Mastermind 29315 points

    Hi,

    By P2P, if you mean two EP devices connected to the J721E RC communicating with each other directly with no help from RC, then no PCIe P2P support. 

    However, the closest to this would be the PCIe backplane Linux demo here in which two RC devices can communicate with each other through a third device that has multiple EP instances: https://software-dl.ti.com/jacinto7/esd/processor-sdk-linux-jacinto7/10_01_00_04/exports/docs/linux/Foundational_Components/Kernel/Kernel_Drivers/PCIe/PCIe_Backplane.html

    Can I get more details on what the full set up is? 

    For example, is it a SSD EP that the J721E EP is trying to access without interference from J721E RC like below. For this, we do not have support for, and customer will have to write some software similar to the PCIe backplane demo, so that the RC kicks off read/writes to the SSD EP based off of J721E EP's requests.

    Regards,

    Lydia

  • 0 回复 Lydia
    Prodigy 110 points

    Thank you for your reply.

    I am aware of the TI NTB solution, but it is not very suitable for my project. Therefore, I am considering the P2P approach.

    1. When you say it is not supported, do you mean that the EP does not support it, or the RC does not support it? I understand that P2P requires support from the RC or a PCIe switch. If the RC does not support it, I can consider using a PCIe switch to implement P2P. However, if the EP itself does not support it, could you explain the reason?

    2. The J721E EP has a DMA controller, correct? Does this mean I can modify the destination address (SSD BAR) in the driver to achieve P2P transfers, assuming the RC supports P2P?

    In addition, I cannot see the image you sent.

    Best regards.

  • 0 回复 zxj
    TI__Mastermind 29315 points

    Hi Ying,

    J721E RC does not support since each PCIe port/controller comes up as a separate bridge on J721E.

    And he following Linux kernel documentation clarifies the limitations with P2P that makes it tricky to implement:

    As for EP not supporting, this will depend on the EP. For example, I have seen FPGA EP that requires very large 64GB mapped to memory space for P2P transactions. J721E limit for PCIe is 4GB space. This is just one example, but you/customer will have to check the EP's datasheet for this one.

    And also share some more details on why this feature is needed, and why the backplane example would not work in the customer's usecase?

    Regards,

    Lydia

  • 0 回复 Lydia
    TI__Mastermind 29315 points

    Hi，

    I understand that you mentioned TI NTB does not fit the customer usecase, but this is the closest example we can currently offer. For both Jacinto and Sitara processors that support PCIe, we do not have an out-of-box example for P2P and no plans in future roadmap as well.

    As for options moving forward:

    • I can put in an internal Jira ticket to see if we can consider this feature in future releases, but unless we can make a good business case, please expect a long time (potentially years) before this gets priority
    • Customer may attempt to implement this feature, but as I mentioned in previous posts, P2P has some limitations and erratas may complicate development using PCIe switch

    Please feel free to comment on these options.

    Regards,