
DC estimation或interference statistic的两种reset mode,分别对应per-chirp和per-frame的累加;
这两种模式的优势和劣势是什么呢,感两种方式的耗时是一样的吗
This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
请看下面e2e工程师的回复。
Please find my responses below:
1. What's the advantage and disadvantage between the two modes.
In per-frame mode, the DC is likely to be estimated only once during the entire run. Typically, a pilot frame of chirps is used to estimate the DC in a paramset with DCEST_RESET_MODE 3. Once the Accumulator is populated with this data, the actual paramsets are configured with DCEST_RESET_MODE set as 0. By doing so, the DC estimation paramset and operation can be skipped which will save cycles to the HWA (DC subtraction only performed with values held in the accumulators).
2. Is the power consumption of the two modes the same?
Per-frame DC estimation will have reduced power consumption when compared with the per-chirp estimation due to the absence of the estimation operation in the subsequent frames.