This thread has been locked.
If you have a related question, please click the "Ask a related question" button in the top right corner. The newly created question will be automatically linked to this question.
Hi support,
We're doing LPDDR4 layout for AM62D.
After reading this version of the DDR design guide https://www.ti.com/lit/an/sprad66b/sprad66b.pdf, I have several confusions.
1. According to LP4_DRS6 in Table 2-7, the propagation delay of DQSx can be greater than DQ/DM.
However, in 3.5.3.2, 'DQSx delays must be less than the DQ and DM delays in the respective BYTEx' is mentioned. Which design rules should be followed?
2. Besides, is LP4_ACRS3 in Table 2-6 too strict compared to LP4_DRS4 in Table 2-7?
The package delay between DDR0_CK0 and DDR0_CK0_N has exceeded the value LP4_ACRS3. So I want to double confirm.
3. According to LP4_DRS3 in Table 2-7, does CK delay must be greater than DQS?
Thank you
Best regards
Wenjin
您好,
1.我认为建议一个字节内的DQS对应具有最短的延迟,但要求允许DQ/DM缩短50ps。 我同意这是一个有点混乱。 让我仔细检查一下,然后回复给您
2.再次,让我再次检查这里。 绝对建议保持两个差分对(CK和DQS)的倾斜程度紧密匹配。 因此,应考虑包装+板的总长度。
3.是的,CK延迟应大于DQS以方便写入水平算法。
Hi Wenjin,
Please pay attention to your post in the English forum, our engineer JJD will help you